| Tumor types:  There has been a long-lasting debate  about classification of canine mammary tumors.   According to the World Health Organization (WHO), canine mammary tumors are histologically  classified into four categories: malignant tumors, benign tumors, unclassified  tumors, and mammary hyperplasias/dysplasias.   This classification reflects cellular atypia, pattern of neoplastic  growth (e.g. tubulopapillary vs. solid), the origin of neoplastic cells (e.g.  epithelial vs. mesenchymal), and descriptive morphology of each cellular  component.  Subclassification depends on  clarification of neoplastic cell profile.   The most   common types are  benign mixed tumor, adenoma, and adenocarcinoma.  Benign mixed tumors consist of epithelial  tumors and mesenchymal tumors, which can be manifested as bone, cartilage, or  fibrous tumor.  Adenoma and  adenocarcinoma have many different subtypes.   In order to incorporate prognostic factors, reclassification of canine  mammary  carcinoma has been attempted  with statistical backups.  This  reclassification, in the order of increasing malignancy, includes  non-infiltrating carcinoma, complex carcinoma (Figure 2), simple carcinoma  and simple anaplastic carcinoma.  | 
        
          |  It may also be of note that inflammatory  carcinoma is not a distinct entity of mammary carcinoma, but rather, a  particularly invasive mammary carcinoma with   prominent inflammation.   Inflammatory carcinomas account for less than 5% of all mammary  tumors.    Causes and risk  factors: The cause of  canine mammary tumors is unknown;  however, there are   several factors that  may influence the development of    mammary gland tumors.  That  hormones such as   estrogen and  progesterone can be a risk factor is shown by the fact that ovariohysterectomy  decreases the incidence of mammary tumors by avoiding the  influence of these hormones.  However, risk of  developing a mammary tumor in later  life is closely associated with the time when a bitch is spayed.  If the dog is spayed before the first estrus,  such risk is less than 1%.  If the spay  is done before the 2nd or 3rd estrus, the  risk is 8% and 26%, respectively.  Little  benefit has been reported with spaying after the 3rd  estrus.  Obesity has been correlated with  higher prevalence of mammary tumors in humans and dogs.   Inherited predisposition for the  development of mammary neoplasms has  been described in human medicine, but studies are still underway in veterinary  medicine. Clinical signs:  What will the pet  owners notice?& Canine mammary tumor  usually appears as variably-sized, single or multiple, soft to firm, discrete  to poorly-defined masses or lumps associated with mammary gland(s).  Dog owners may notice color change (red to  purple) and/or ulceration on these masses.   Clinical signs relevant to tumor-associated disease may be noticed on  rare occasions.  In particular,  inflammatory carcinoma has been described to cause significant pain in the  mammary region, axilla, groin, or medial aspects of the limbs due to extensive  inflammation and/or edema secondary to tumor invasion in regional lymph vessels  and nodes.  With metastatic disease,  clinical manifestations would reflect the affected   organ’s location and function; for  instance, a dog with pulmonary metastasis might show dyspnea or intolerance for exercise. Diagnosis:  Clinical  evaluation of the patient is  important as part of the diagnostic procedures. Thorough palpation of both mammary chains  is indispensable.  Tumors are more often found in the caudal  pair of mammary glands.   Multicentric involvement  is common.  Care should be taken to   distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic  masses such as cystic hyperplasia or duct ectasia if a patient is in estrus or  has recently experienced pregnancy or pseudopregnancy.  These masses sometimes simulate neoplasia;  however, they usually regress as the& influence of estrogen declines.   As a part of the clinical evaluation,  complete blood count and serum chemistry profiles are performed.  Thoracic (3 views-left and right laterals and  ventro-  dorsal) and abdominal (2  views—lateral and ventro-dorsal) radiographs are useful to detect metastases.  Ultrasound examination is indicated if  metastasis to the abdominal organs is suspected.   The definitive diagnosis is based on  histopathology on excisional biopsy specimens.   In addition to aforementioned histological classification, WHO suggests  tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging on canine mammary tumors to provide more  practical prognostic information.  This staging is based  on the size of the primary tumor, presence/absence of tumor metastasis to  regional lymph nodes, and presence/absence of distant metastasis (Table 1).  The greater the stage, the poorer the  prognosis.   
              
                | Stage
 | PrimaryTumor
 | Regional LN Status  | Distant Metastasis  |  
                | I  | T1 | NO | MO |  
                | II  | T2 | NO | MO |  
                | III  | T3 | NO | MO |  
                | IV  | Any T | N1 | MO |  
                | V  | Any T | Any N | M1 |   Table 1.  Modified TNM staging of canine mammary gland  tumor. 
              (Reference: Philbert JC et al: 2003.J Vet  Intern Med 17:102-6)
                
                  T1 < 3 cm  maximum diameterT2  3-5 cm maximum  diameter T3  > 5 cm  maximum diameter NO Histologically no metastasis N1 Histologic  metastasis MO No distant  metastasis M1 Distant  metastasis detected.  
 Though fine needle  aspirate (FNA) and cytological evaluation of the sample has been reported as  part of the diagnostic workup, they rarely provide information as to the  malignancy of a mammary tumor.  Mast cell  tumor in a mammary location can be readily ruled in/out by FNA. Treatment:  There are  several options to treat canine mammary tumors including surgery, chemotherapy,  radiation, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, and diet.  Nonetheless, surgical excision is still the  most effective modality. The choice of  surgical methods has been vigorously discussed; however, it is important to  tailor the remedy to clients’ needs and to treat patients individually.  If surgery is successful, with clear& histologic margins, and the patient has  no evidence of lymph node involvement or metastasis, chemotherapy is not  recommended.  The most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents are doxorubicin  and cisplatin.  One potential side effect  of doxorubicin is cardio-toxicity.   Potential renal toxicity may occur with the use of cisplatin.  Paclitaxel has been experimentally used to  treat canine malignant mammary tumors with high   incidence of side effects.   Hormonal therapy, such as tamoxifen citrate (an antiestrogen drug used  in human estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer), has been used in a limited  number of dogs.  An advantage of this  medication is that it can be given orally.   The disadvantage is that 25% of the animals have side effects such as  vulvar swelling and pyometra.  Radiation  therapy and immunotherapy have been studied, but efficacy is not proven.  A theory proposing that a high protein/low  fat diet may prolong survival has been advanced. Prognosis:  The most  important prognostic information is derived from the WHO staging system and  histologic diagnosis.  Size of the tumor  is thought to be a good prognostic indicator.   Dogs with smaller (less than 5 cm in diameter) malignant tumors have a  better prognosis for long-term survival.   Metastasis is observed in about half of malignant tumor cases.  Histologic evaluation is critical not only to  determine the origin of the neoplastic cells, but also to find microscopic  evidence of possible metastases.  For  example, invasiveness of tumor cells into adjacent normal tissue can be  demonstrated by immunohistochemistry with antibody for calponin (marker for  myoepithelial cells), which will distinguish in situ from invasive carcinoma.  Early  surgical intervention and the method of surgery play important roles in  prolonging survival.  Ovariohysterectomy  at the time of tumor excision has been recognized to increase  survival time. -by Dr. Ikki Mitsui,  ADDL Graduate Student References 
              
                Alenza  MDP, Tabanera E, Peňa: 2001.  Inflammatory mammary carcinoma in dogs: 33  cases (1995-1999).  JAVMA 219:1110-1114.
                Hahn KA,  Richardson RC, Knapp DW: 1992.   Canine  malignant mammary neoplasia: biological behavior, diagnosis and treatment  alternatives.  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc  28:251-56.
                Misdorp  W: 2002.  Tumors of the mammary  gland.  IN: Tumors in Domestic Animals,  ed. Meuten DJ, 4th ed. pp 575-606.   Iowa State Press, Ames, IA
                Philibert  JC, Snyder PW, Glickman N, Glickman LT, Knapp DW, Waters DJ: 2003.  Influence of host factors on survival in dogs  with malignant mammary gland tumors.  J  Vet Intern Med 17: 102-106.
                Rutteman  GR, Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG: 2001.  Tumors  of the mammary gland.  IN: Small Animal  Clinical Oncology, eds. Withrow SJ, MacEwen EG, 3rd ed., pp 455-477.  WB Saunders, Philadelphia 
                Waldron  DR: 2001.  Diagnosis and surgical management of mammary neoplasia in dogs  and cats.  Vet Med 96: 943-948 |